The idea that Government withhold information for your public has become outdated. Over the last decade, many countries have enacted legislations on freedom of knowledge. In India, the Official Secrets Act 1923 was enacted to protect the official secrets. The new law intend to disclose information replacing the ' culture of secrecy '. It's going to promote public accountability which will trim the malpractices, mismanagement, abuse of discretion and bribery etc. - revolution
OBJECTIVES: The object of RTI is to empower the citizens, promote transparency and accountability inside the working of the Government. The Act is a huge step towards making the citizens informed about the activities of the Government. Social Activist Aruna Roy has described India's RTI as " probably the most fundamental law this country has seen."
Aftereffect of RIGHT TO INFORMATION: Even though the debate on corruption in the united states rages on, the RTI Act is fast growing as a good anti- corruption tool.
Jan Lok Pal Bill gained tremendous public support with citizens being released on the streets of Delhi, Bangalore as well as other cities to voice their anger over corruption. Where RTI was used by journalists and the media, the law includes a broad base of users. Earlier directly to freedom of speech and expression is granted under Article 19(1) of Constitution, however it requires fair and efficient procedure to make the freedom of information work. Inside the first three years, 2 million RTI requests were filed. The foremost and well known movement was by Mazdoor Kissan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) in Rajasthan for the access to village accounts. Case studies and media reports demonstrates RTI is being used to redress individual grievances, access entitlements including Ration Cards and pension. The RTI has paved way for informed citizenry which will strengthen the democratic Government asia. With this Act, we could use our to speech and expressions and control the Government activities effectively. The idea of open Government has become a reality with the implementation of RTI Act. The RTI may be called a success as long as the bureaucracy accepts that they have constitutional to serve into.
PROVISIONS OF RTI: Section 3 says all citizens shall have to information. The Act enforces a duty upon the public authorities to disclosed all information. In V.S.Lee V. State of Kerala.. the remedy given by Parliament is that wherever there is certainly substantial financial support, the People, have the right to know or information. Section 4(2) states that every public authority shall take constant steps to supply information suo moto towards the public. Thus, the police have to give information voluntarily so the public have minimum turn to use this Act. The general public authorities also have to disseminate (making known or communicated the data to the public through notice boards, newspapers, public announcements, media broad casts, internet and inspection of offices of public authority) information widely in all forms which is easily accessible to the public. Information can be obtained by request on paper or through electronic means in English or Hindi or perhaps in official language of the area U/S 6. Here, the person has to give fees, and when request can't be produced in writing, the Central PIO assuring PIO shall render all assistance to make request in writing form. If the information continues to be provided correctly or within time, it may be made available by appeal or complaint for the Information Commission U/S (8(a) 1). Inside the Registrar General V. K.U. Rajasekar, it was held that Section 8 of RTI specially relates to the cases of exemption from disclosure or information when such information affects prejudicially the sovereignty and security asia etc. Section 5 says every public authority shall within 100 times of enactment of the Act, designate as much as officers as the Central Public Information Officers or State Public Information Officers. - revolution